Best of 2007: The Year in Film

User Rating:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars (4 votes, average: 3.5 out of 4)
Loading ... Loading ...

by Dale J. Nauertz

Believe the hype, people: 2007 was a great year for movies! As usual, you have to look past all the big ticket items (especially “Transformers”, which sucked) to find greatness. But it is there, just waiting to be discovered by those willing to look. You’ve got to kiss a lot of frogs to find a prince (which reminds me: “Enchanted” is much better than you might suspect with Amy Adams giving one of the finest performances of the year) but they are out there. I’ve kissed a lot of those cinematic frogs and this is my opportunity to reveal the princes I found in 2007. That way, you can kiss less frogs…or something. I know this introduction is kinda lame, so let’s just get down to it…

1. There Will Be Blood!

“Sweeney Todd” is a darker examination of humanity’s capacity for evil, so that’s not the reason this is at the top of my list. “Juno” has more human and natural characters, so that’s not why “Blood” is here either. And pretty much any of the movies on my list is more violent and disturbing. So why the hell IS “There Will Be Blood!” my pick for the Best Movie of 2007? If you’re asking that question, then you obviously haven’t seen it. Daniel Day Lewis gives a towering, majestic performance. It’s not just the performance of the year or the performance of the decade, it’s one of the finest performances in the history of cinema. It’s better than anything Marlon Brando ever did. It’s better than anything Jimmy Stewart or John Wayne ever did. As much as I hate to say it, it’s even better than anything Clint Eastwood or Tom Hanks have ever done. I can’t risk overpraising this performance, it’s just that good. But, no, Lewis’s performance isn’t even the reason this movie is at the top of my list. The reason it’s at the top of my list is because it’s one of the grandest epics in the history of cinema, a triumphant spectacle that is more than mere spectacle. Any single frame of this movie is haunting. P.T. Anderson has made a movie that reminded me of Terrence Malick in its rapturous beauty and haunting vistas…but it’s more personal and engrossing than anything Malick has ever done. It’s filled with subtle little moments, tiny touches that pay huge emotional dividends in the context of events later on. It builds like no other movie this year, like few movies I’ve ever seen. It didn’t leave me hollow inside or drain me or anything like that. In fact, I found it shot through with a wicked sense of gallows humor. It simply provides a powerful, elegant portrait of a man willing to do whatever he has to, play up whatever aspect he must, in order to succeed. Lewis’s portrayal of Daniel Plainview is a portrait of a man who learns early on to ignore his soul, to banish it from his thoughts. He’s a fascinating individual, though Paul Dano’s portrayal of Eli Sunday (who seems to be Plainview’s moral opposite but is, if anything, perhaps even more diabolically corrupt) is nearly as captivating, in an extraordinary movie about souls, their value, and the explosive and deplorable acts that happen in their absence. Every scene, every frame of this movie is epic and stunning in a way totally unique to this film. That’s why “There Will Be Blood!” rises above the sum of its parts. That’s why it’s so remarkable. And that is why it is sitting firmly atop this magnificent list.

2. Hot Fuzz

“Hot Fuzz” is the most fun I had at the movies all year, the loudest and longest I laughed, and the giddiest I got. But beyond that it’s the most finely-crafted comedy in at least a decade. It’s a refreshing change from the shaggy improvisation of movies like “Knocked Up” or “Anchorman”. Every line in this movie is meticulous, every moment works perfectly within the clockwork organization of the plot and is timed for the maximum comedic potential. This film is hilarious, yes, but there are jokes you don’t even get the first time around because they don’t click for you until your second or third viewing. More than any other movie on this list, “Hot Fuzz” DEMANDS a second or third viewing just to confirm the strands of plot it has expertly (and rather ridiculously) tied together the first time, to catch subtle human moments you were laughing too hard to notice, and to discover the little background gags and nuanced movie references you missed before. The plot may be silly, but its also airtight. The gags are uproarious but also grounded in character and setting. The film references peppered throughout are wonderful, but they never disrupt the film’s subtle balance or compromise its originality. Plus, the performances are sweet, the story is satisfying, and the action sequences flat-out rule!

3. Juno

It’s got all the usual trappings of a too-precocious-for-its-own-good indie comedy: an independent soundtrack in which you can almost hear the individual guitar strums, dialogue that’s striving so hard to be clever that it loses all touch with the way actual humans speak, and a wardrobe you might find at a garage sale. For the first fifteen minutes or so, “Juno” grated on my nerves. I was prepared to write a scathing review of this movie. But then the damn movie snuck under my defenses. The dialogue got richer, more natural. The goofy little songs began to fit the plot. The characters got under my skin and made me care. By the end of this movie, I was cringing at the choices these characters might make and the people they might hurt in doing so. I cared about Juno (the magnificent Ellen Page) the guy who got her knocked up (Michael Cera) her parents (J.K. Simmons and Allison Janney, both phenomenal) and the prospective adoptive parents of her baby (Jennifer Garner, who is great as usual and Jason Bateman, who is better than I’ve ever seen him) more than I’ve cared about any other characters this year. When the movie threatens to get sappy, I didn’t even mind. These characters have earned every happy little moment the movie gives them. I loved “Thank You For Smoking”, director Jason Reitman’s debut film. I love “Juno”, his follow-up, even more. This is the movie “Knocked Up” SHOULD have been.

4. Sweeney Todd

It’s a dark little tale, grippingly told, that will haunt you for days. And the songs will haunt you even longer. I had no idea Tim Burton could make a movie this vicious, bloody and baroque. It’s a stunning achievement, by a director I’ve admired forever. It’s his most mature and harrowing work. When I first saw it, I thought it was second only to “Ed Wood” on his resume. Having seen “Ed Wood” again, I now think “Sweeney Todd” is second to nothing. Of course, my opinion on things like this changes from day to day, depending on mood and my cynicism toward the human race. On days when I’m feeling forgiving, I’ll choose “Ed Wood”. But there are days when I can see where Sweeney is coming from when he sings “there’s a hole in the world like a great big pit and the people of the world are there in it and the people of the world are filled with shit”. On those days, I will relish every drop of blood in “Sweeney Todd”, the darkest movie of the year.

5. Zodiac

As a standard-issue serial killer thriller, “Zodiac” is a disappointment. The killings aren’t fun to watch or sufficiently gruesome at all. Instead they are squirm-inducing and genuinely chilling, which is only part of what makes David Fincher’s film about the Zodiac killer and the men who tried to track him down so brilliant. The other ingredient of its brilliance is that it’s a fascinating portrait of obsession, not just on the part of the killer but on the part of the men who spent decades attempting to track him down. That the killer was never actually captured only makes the story more mesmerizing. The movie isn’t just clicking off the minutes until the killer is revealed and incarcerated. It’s a much trickier beast than that, putting us in the shoes of the men who ruined their family lives and drove themselves nuts (or into an early grave) chasing a maddeningly elusive phantom and attempting to bring him to justice. All the performances are great, the atmosphere is moody, obsessive and at times unnerving, and the pace is slow but steady and never boring. Fincher uses few of his usual visual tricks in this movie. He doesn’t need to. The emotional heft and riveting story on the screen are more than enough. He’s put together what is possibly the finest film of his career.

6. Waitress

“Waitress” has a quality that few movies possess: whimsy. “Waitress” is beautifully whimsical. It’s quirky without being overbearing (a quality most quirky things cannot manage), it’s delightful without being sappy, it brims with heart and humor and the unassailable greatness of pie. It’s also sad, dark and surprisingly complicated for what should be a trifle of a romantic comedy. Keri Russell is wonderful as the titular waitress, Nathan Fillion is charming to the extreme as her dreamy doctor and Andy Griffith puts in a marvelous supporting turn as a crotchety old bastard. It’s too bad that director Adrienne Shelly was murdered shortly after completing this film. After witnessing her triumphant, wonderful debut I would have faithfully gone to every movie she made. The second best movie of the year about unplanned pregnancy.

7. Beowulf

As far as pure spectacle goes, “Beowulf” is astounding. I might wish Robert Zemeckis were making quirky, energetic movies like he used to, but I can find no fault with the spectacular, envelope-pushing majesty of this one. This movie is literally eye-popping. If the Academy weren’t composed of such fuddy-duddies then this would have gotten a nomination for Best Animated Film (it’s better than anything that is nominated…though “Ratatouille” is pretty darn good). Oh well, that doesn’t make “Beowulf” any less stunning or entertaining and, in the long run, that’s really all that counts. Not only is it a visual feast, but it’s solid from a character and story standpoint as well. It captivates the eyes and the mind, posing some interesting moral conundrums during its running length to go along with all the awesome dragon and beastie battles. Grendel, for example, is a tragic character that is not only rendered eerily but gains our begrudging sympathy. Like Daniel Plainview in “There Will Be Blood!”, the character of Beowulf gains the fame and success he so desperately seeks…but he loses a lot of his soul to get there. Surprisingly magnificent.

8. 1408

Better than the Stephen King story it is based upon, “1408″ is a search for truth and redemption for Mike Enslin (John Cusack). Enslin is a fascinating character: a snarky cynic staying in haunted places in order to write books he hates about them for a profit. He’s wrapped himself so tightly in his cynical armor that he doesn’t seem to realize that he wants to experience the supernatural more than anyone else. He yearns for the hope that proof of the spirit world would give him, any hint that his deceased daughter might actually be out there somewhere (this is, as you might guess, the event that prompted him to don his defensive armor of cynicism in the first place). That all changes when he checks into Room 1408, a room that thrashes right through his armor and hits him in all the tender spots he didn’t know he had. 1408 is more psychologically rich than a simple haunted hotel movie has any right to be, and it cleaves a lot closer to the bone than I expected. That’s all because of Cusack’s natural, fearless performance. It’s his best work since 2000’s “High Fidelity” and it exposes both a mean streak and a soft white underbelly that Cusack has kept hidden up to now. His performance easily carries the movie (which is good, because it has to) and the horrors unleashed in Room 1408 are more than mere ghosts or axe-wielding psychos. The horrors of Room 1408 get under the skin (Enslin’s and our own) and challenge Enslin’s sanity. It’s a dark night of the human soul, a crucible in which Cusack will either get stronger or break. “1408″ is a great film that looks like a B-film, a movie with a lot more meat on its bones than it appears. It’s compelling stuff, and it more than belongs on this list.

9. Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead

It took a while for this movie to really grab me, but it did, tightly, and it never let go. It begins like the standard “desperate guys try to break the law but everything goes horribly wrong” movie. You’ve got two schlubs (Ethan Hawke and Phillip Seymour Hoffman) who are in over their head (Hawke’s an immature little shit with lots of debts, Hoffman’s a greedy shit who’s embezzling to fund his drug habit). They know of a jewelry store they can knock off (it belongs to Albert Finney and Rosemary Harris, their mom and dad). They attempt to knock it off but fuck it up. Then everything spirals further and further out of control. In the first forty-five minutes or so, things go south in ways you can see coming. But once the snags start coming fast, furious and from left field, the movie’s grim fatalism really kicks into high gear. By the end, the movie’s revelations and surprises hit me in the gut. Sidney Lumet has crafted a tight, efficient, hard-hitting crime drama that generates real impact. It’s not the finest movie he’s made, or the finest crime drama of the year, but it’s haunting, piercing stuff that cuts you with edges you never expect. “Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead” is a rather routine story told with raw, gripping power.

10. No Country for Old Men

No, it’s not the greatest movie of the year. But before its jarring left turn in Act Three (a bold move, to say the least, though not one I really care for at the moment…the years may change my stand on that) “No Country For Old Men” is spellbinding. It weaves a nearly palpable atmosphere of dread and trepidation. The cinematography is gorgeous, the performances are astounding (especially Bardem and Brolin) and the storytelling wraps a dense net around you…which tightens with every moment…until it comes unraveled. Even so, “No Country for Old Men” is powerful stuff. Standard greatness from the great Coen Brothers.

Runners up…

“Ratatouille” is a cute, playful exploration of creativity and criticism. It’s about the magic of food and the joyful act of creation. It sags a little in parts, but it’s still thrilling, wondrous and surprisingly effective with single moments that are as good as anything else I’ve seen this year. With “Cars” Pixar was pandering to Nascar Nation. Here, they’re going for the opposite end of the societal spectrum. However, that has nothing to do with why I think it’s the superior film: it’s better because of its plucky, vibrantly detailed lead character and its sweet, playful storytelling. It’s unique, classy and winning.

“3:10 to Yuma” is a great Western with natural, effective performances and a snappy pace. It’s not quite as good as 2003’s criminally underrated “Open Range” but it’s a lot of fun with absorbing characters and great action. The only problem is that it establishes its characters so believably that when they do some unbelievable things at the climax it feels like incredible bullshit.

Grindhouse” was second to “Hot Fuzz” as the most fun I had in a theater this year, and second only to “Beowulf”’s 3-D IMAX presentation as the most unique theatrical experience. The two films in it (”Planet Terror” and, to a lesser extent, “Death Proof”) were immensely entertaining. But what really elevates “Grindhouse” as an experience are the fake trailers, ads, and other bits of ephemera sprinkled throughout. “Grindhouse” was a loving tribute to the act of actually seeing a movie and, as such, I loved it. Also, its bold experimentation was underrated. If only more modern filmmakers had the guts to give us such a unique experience at the movies.

“The Darjeeling Limited” is a trifle, really. But it’s a wonderful trifle. I loved Owen Wilson, Adrien Brody and Jason Schwartzman as three troubled brothers on a spiritual journey in India. I love the exotic feel of the film and the hilarity of its character-based dialogue and situations. Though, as much as I loved spending time with these characters in these places and situations, I just wish the movie would have had a bit more of a point. However, this movie comes from Wes Anderson, who sometimes hides his point in unexpected moments to be discovered on repeat viewings. Who knows? Two years from now this might be my favorite film of 2007.

Then again, the same goes for all the movies on this list.

8 Responses to “Best of 2007: The Year in Film”

  1. Jones Says:

    Nice variety in the list. I would agree with a large part of it (at least with reagrds to the movies I’ve seen on it, which are few). I have to take exception with the “Knocked UP” hate though. Perhaps I will get off my ass and make my own list (yeah right!).

    Rest assured my #1 film of the year would be the same as yours. Nothing that has come out in years holds a candle to “There Will Be Blood! and I suspect we won’t see a film of it’s caliber for many years to come.

  2. Ecksem Diem Says:

    Oh, come on, 1408 sucked, and I went in with the absolutely perfect demeanor for it: expecting that it would suck but being prepared to be surprised as far as its quality was concerned, and not WANTING it to suck (which, admittedly, I did want for Die Limp (to suck, that is), and it didn’t fail to deliver on any level), and I came out thinking it sucked. It was entertaining here and there, but I saw that “big twist” (the one that comes about while he’s in the post office) coming a mile away, as well as the tape recorder revelation at the end (I’m trying not to kill anything, and I have a feeling that I’m failing utterly. To anyone who hasn’t seen it, I apologize if I am killing it, but don’t sweat it; you’re not missing anything). 1408’s ultimate failing? It’s based on a story that was written in fragments and had the sole purpose of accompanying a book about writing dynamics. As a result, the story is contrived and formulaic, and the movie is really only above the typical waste of time that is most horror entries because it’s based on something written by King, who, hit or miss, simply knows what works and what doesn’t after so many years. Still, that doesn’t make it work as a whole.

    In other news: ME WANTY PODCAST! ME WANTY PODCAST!

    P. S. - All apologies for the awkwardness of this post. I was writing it out and couldn’t think of the word “formulaic” when I came to that point in the post, so I had to sit down and go quietly insane for ten minutes while trying to figure out the word I was looking for. Consequently, I started going through what I’d written and reworked how I elaborated on pretty much all of my points, with the final product almost certainly being inferior to what I had originally (perhaps I should write web postings in drafts from now on).

    Also, my lamp is now broken.

  3. Elk Says:

    Ecksem, I as well “wanty podcast”. And I also find myself frequently re-editing my posts.

    As for There Will Be Blood, I will be seeing that at my next chance. I highly look forward to it. Or maybe Juno, seeing as how seeing that will help me impress a girl.

    So should I go for the girl or the awesome violence?

  4. Dale Nauertz Says:

    Elk-”There Will Be Blood” isn’t really about awesome violence (though the title does not lie), but you still need to see it, and the big screen is the only place that truly does it justice (not that I’ve seen it anywhere else yet). It’s a big panoramic epic that still thrives on little human moments, and I’m not kidding when I say it’s one of the best movies ever made. However, if you’re in the mood for a great comedy/drama without sap or oozing sentimentality, then “Juno” is amazing. It definitely took me by surprise. Also, there are far worse movies to go to in order to impress a girl. I say go for the girl…but still see “Blood” at some point. Daniel Day Lewis pwns all newbs (God, I feel like such a schmuck just typing that).

    As for “1408″, well, I loved it. I can’t make anyone else love it. I tried to make the best possible case for why I loved it and I don’t expect to win any converts (though it would be nice). I thought it was a meaty psychological piece (admittedly, I knew that the post office thing and the tape recorder thing were going to happen, it just didn’t bother me that they did) with a great main character that gave Cusack something to sink his talents into.

    P.S. Sorry to hear about your lamp. I will observe a moment of silence in its honor.

  5. Ecksem Diem Says:

    I saw There Will Be Blood tonight and came out of it conflicted. It was without a doubt extremely good, as was Day-Lewis’ performance, but I felt that the film was nuanced and somewhat disjointed in places, and that Day-Lewis’ performance, while excellent and likely as good as it could have been, was not one of the finest performances of all time as many have said. I exited the film about an hour ago.

    It has grown upon me immensely since that time.

    The way in which a sound, neither an effect representing part of the scenery nor a note that was part of the score, blared at times throughout the beginning of the movie for nothing more than mere punctuation, it reminded me of something. It was hard to finger, at first, but I knew that I liked it; that there was something almost moving about this mere sound, there for no reason, that made me feel as though threatened by the scene, as if I was involved; as if the events of it could hurt me. The blaring did not remain throughout the entirety of the film, but other sounds did. Again, sounds not part of the soundtrack or the scenery, but simply punctuation for the sentences and paragraphes that comprise a scene, if you were to hold in your hands a perfect translation of film to word. Exclamation points, ellipsises; they were all there, all hiding within, or perhaps just outright represented, by these sounds that pervased the film. I loved them. And why shouldn’t I? I know these sounds, these bits of punctuation. I’ve heard–read, if you will–all of them, and all in the same collection of works.

    The works of Stanley Kubrick. 2001 is the greatest example of it; The Shining is a more subtle approach to this punctuation on film that I speak of. I’ll need to sleep on it in order to gather my thoughts on the film itself and the performance of Daniel Day-Lewis, but of this much I am certain: giving the Academy Award to Paul Thomas Anderson for his masterpiece (it may not be a masterpiece in its own right (again, I’ll have to sleep on it), but it is HIS masterpiece) is the closest the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will ever come to giving the coveted statuette to Stanley Kburick, and they would be best to do as much as they can to rectify that stunning four-time slight.

    P. S. - Thank you for your condolences. My lamp is surely in a better place, free of my abuse; just as little Mary Sunday was free from Abel’s abuse once Daniel Plainview rolled into town.

  6. Ecksem Diem Says:

    Oh, yeah, TWBB also had some really kickass camera work, and is a fine example of using a wide aspect to its fullest.

  7. Ecksem Diem Says:

    Oh, and one more thing: There Will Be Blood wasn’t nominated for best score? What the FUCK?!

  8. Jones Says:

    Yeah, it got boned on best score over some lame Academy technicality. Something having to do with the fact that a “portion” of the music had been composed in 2006 and wasn’t originally intended for this movie or some bullshit like that.

    I think they’re just afraid of giving an Oscar to a member of Radiohead.

    There was some other movie that people thought would be a contender for best score that got shafted on the same technicality. I can’t remember what it was though. Hmmm…

    Come to think of it the Academy has a lot of stupid rules like this. The other one that comes to mind is the foreign film category. They only let each country submit one film. So, say for instance that France has 3 great movies come out in a year (I know the possibility of this happening is slim, but hang with me). They can only submit one of them to the Academy for consideration for the Best Foreign Film Oscar. Even if those 3 films deserved to be among the 5 nominees it wouldn’t matter. Too bad so sad.

    And as always, quite lame on the Academy’s part.

    PS - There just may be in a podcast in your future. :)

Leave a Reply

Netflix, Inc.