<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review - Watchmen</title>
	<link>http://afistfulofreviews.com/2009/03/10/watchmen/</link>
	<description>We waste our money so you don't have to.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duesterbeck</title>
		<link>http://afistfulofreviews.com/2009/03/10/watchmen/#comment-654</link>
		<author>Joe Duesterbeck</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://afistfulofreviews.com/2009/03/10/watchmen/#comment-654</guid>
					<description>I must tastefully disagree.  The movie was full of bad acting, the story was lame, and besides the great fight scenes, the movie was awful.  2 out of 5 stars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must tastefully disagree.  The movie was full of bad acting, the story was lame, and besides the great fight scenes, the movie was awful.  2 out of 5 stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ecks</title>
		<link>http://afistfulofreviews.com/2009/03/10/watchmen/#comment-655</link>
		<author>Ecks</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://afistfulofreviews.com/2009/03/10/watchmen/#comment-655</guid>
					<description>Great book, great adaption, loved the tweaked-with ending (and definitely agree with your observation that it gives it a more "wrath of God" feel).

Beyond Malin Akerman, who I felt was lousy, but not lousy enough to degrade the film itself in anyway, I actually found the acting to be nothing short of phenomenal.  Jackie Earle Haley as Rorschach reminded me in many ways of (and to me was nearly on par with) Heath Ledger's performance last year as The Joker, a performance which I found to be one of the best ever on screen.  I thought Nite Owl's portrayal was spot on, with the man behind the mask being more or less a wall until he's in costume, which is when he suddenly has a personality.

Finally, I thought Dr. Manhattan was executed with nothing short of perfection, both in Billy Crudup's portrayal and in the computer-generated design of the character itself (though I can swear someone sitting near me snickered every time his penis was visible).  The montage, set to Phillip Glass' "Pruit Igoe" (written for the film "Koyaanisqatsi"), of Dr. Manhattan's rebirth and the development of him as an object of terror for America's enemies, is up there as one of the more heart-stopping and affecting sequences I've seen put to screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great book, great adaption, loved the tweaked-with ending (and definitely agree with your observation that it gives it a more &#8220;wrath of God&#8221; feel).</p>
<p>Beyond Malin Akerman, who I felt was lousy, but not lousy enough to degrade the film itself in anyway, I actually found the acting to be nothing short of phenomenal.  Jackie Earle Haley as Rorschach reminded me in many ways of (and to me was nearly on par with) Heath Ledger&#8217;s performance last year as The Joker, a performance which I found to be one of the best ever on screen.  I thought Nite Owl&#8217;s portrayal was spot on, with the man behind the mask being more or less a wall until he&#8217;s in costume, which is when he suddenly has a personality.</p>
<p>Finally, I thought Dr. Manhattan was executed with nothing short of perfection, both in Billy Crudup&#8217;s portrayal and in the computer-generated design of the character itself (though I can swear someone sitting near me snickered every time his penis was visible).  The montage, set to Phillip Glass&#8217; &#8220;Pruit Igoe&#8221; (written for the film &#8220;Koyaanisqatsi&#8221;), of Dr. Manhattan&#8217;s rebirth and the development of him as an object of terror for America&#8217;s enemies, is up there as one of the more heart-stopping and affecting sequences I&#8217;ve seen put to screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://afistfulofreviews.com/2009/03/10/watchmen/#comment-660</link>
		<author>shawn</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://afistfulofreviews.com/2009/03/10/watchmen/#comment-660</guid>
					<description>i read the book in preparation for the movie and loved it.  but then when i went to see the movie i was shocked at how closely they followed the book with the exception being the ending.  that being said i was kind of bored it was like deja vu i felt like i had already seen it having just finished to book.  don't think you can fault a movie for following a book too closely can you now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read the book in preparation for the movie and loved it.  but then when i went to see the movie i was shocked at how closely they followed the book with the exception being the ending.  that being said i was kind of bored it was like deja vu i felt like i had already seen it having just finished to book.  don&#8217;t think you can fault a movie for following a book too closely can you now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

